🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just who would win overall, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on the island with a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.