🔗 Share this article

For months, intimidating messages recurred. Originally, allegedly from a former police officer and a former defense officer, subsequently from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh asserts he was ordered to the local precinct and instructed bluntly: stop speaking out or experience severe repercussions.

This third-generation resident is one of many opposing a multimillion-dollar project where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – is scheduled to be razed and modernized by a multinational conglomerate.

"The culture of the slum is like nowhere else in the globe," states the resident. "However the plan aims to eradicate our community and silence our voices."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of the slum sit in stark contrast to the towering buildings and Bollywood penthouses that overshadow the area. Homes are assembled randomly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, unregulated industries produce dangerous fumes and the air is saturated with the overpowering odor of open sewers.

For certain residents, the vision of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of premium apartments, organized recreational areas, shiny shopping centers and residences with proper sanitation is a hopeful vision achieved.

"We don't have proper healthcare, roads or drainage and there are no spaces for kids to enjoy," states a tea vendor, 56, who relocated from southern India in that period. "The single option is to demolish everything and construct proper housing."

Community Resistance

Yet certain residents, such as Shaikh, are opposing the redevelopment.

None deny that this community, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring financial support and improvement. However they worry that this plan – lacking community input – could potentially turn premium city property into an elite enclave, displacing the marginalized, immigrant populations who have been there since the nineteenth century.

These were these marginalized, relocated individuals who built up the empty marshland into an extensively researched phenomenon of community resilience and economic productivity, whose economic value is valued at between $1m and $2m per year, making it one of the world's largest unregulated sectors.

Resettlement Issues

Among approximately a million people living in the packed 220-hectare neighborhood, a minority will be able for replacement housing in the redevelopment, which is projected to take seven years to accomplish. Others will be relocated to barren areas and saline fields on the far outskirts of the metropolis, risking break up a long-established community. Some will not get residences at all.

Those allowed to continue living in Dharavi will be allocated units in high-rise buildings, a substantial change from the evolved, shared lifestyle of residing and operating that has maintained Dharavi for many years.

Industries from clothing production to ceramic crafts and waste processing are projected to shrink in number and be relocated to an allocated "industrial sector" distant from residential areas.

Livelihood Crisis

For those such as the leather artisan, a workshop owner and multi-generational inhabitant to call home this community, the redevelopment presents a survival challenge. His rickety, three-storey facility produces apparel – formal jackets, luxury coats, fashionable garments – distributed in luxury boutiques in the city's affluent areas and overseas.

Household members resides in the rooms underneath and employees and sewers – laborers from different regions – reside there, enabling him to sustain operations. Outside Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are frequently 10 times more expensive for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

In the administrative buildings nearby, a visual representation of the Dharavi project illustrates a contrasting outlook. Well-groomed residents mill about on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, purchasing western-style baguettes and croissants and having coffee on a patio adjacent to Dharavi Cafe and treat station. It is a world away from the inexpensive idli sambar breakfast and low-cost tea that maintains the neighborhood.

"This is not improvement for residents," says the protester. "This constitutes a massive property transaction that will render it impossible for residents to remain."

There is also distrust of the development company. Run by a prominent businessman – a leading figure and a supporter of the Indian prime minister – the corporation has encountered allegations of favoritism and questionable practices, which it rejects.

While local authorities labels it a partnership, the developer paid nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A case claiming that the project was unfairly awarded to the business group is being considered in the top court.

Sustained Harassment

Since they began to vocally oppose the redevelopment, protesters and community members assert they have been faced a long-running campaign of pressure and threats – including messages, clear intimidation and implications that opposing the project was equivalent to anti-national sentiment – by figures they assert represent the corporate group.

Among those suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c